Most foreign companies enter India with a single plan.
One product strategy.
One pricing model.
One go-to-market approach.
On paper, it feels sensible. India is one country. One legal system. One massive population.
And then reality hits.
One city performs well. Another barely moves.
Sales pick up in one region and completely stall in the next.
Scaling feels slower, messier, more expensive than expected.
At first, teams blame execution. The sales force. The partners. The market conditions.
But that’s not the real issue.
The problem is the assumption.
India isn’t one market.
For business, it behaves more like a collection of very different markets—closer to Europe than to a single country.
In countries like Japan or Korea, national strategies work.
Income levels are relatively consistent.
Consumer behavior doesn’t change dramatically city to city.
Language and culture are largely shared.
So one strategy can scale cleanly.
India doesn’t work that way.
Political unity doesn’t mean economic or cultural uniformity. Business behavior, purchasing power, language, and even expectations of service can change sharply every few hundred kilometers.
A strategy that works beautifully in one Indian city can fail completely in another—without anything being “wrong” with it.
A useful mental model is Europe.
Europe is one region. But no company would expect the same plan to work equally well in Germany, Italy, and Poland.
India works in a similar way.
Languages change frequently.
Cultural norms differ by state.
Income gaps are wide.
Consumer priorities aren’t uniform.
The mistake many foreign companies make is trying to scale India before they’ve really understood its internal differences.
One simple way to make sense of this complexity is to think in terms of India 1, India 2, and India 3. It’s not a rigid classification—just a useful way to think.
India 1
Large metropolitan cities with higher incomes and strong global exposure.
You’ll typically see:
Higher purchasing power
Faster adoption of global products
Strong talent pools
Highly competitive markets
These markets are well suited for:
Premium and mid-premium products
Technology and services
B2B, finance, and consulting
Brand-led strategies
India 2
Mid-sized cities with a fast-growing middle class.
Common traits:
Strong aspirations, but high price sensitivity
Rapid industrial and manufacturing growth
Rising consumption
These markets work well for:
Manufacturing and industrial operations
Mid-range consumer products
Regional expansion hubs
Cost-conscious innovation
India 3
Smaller cities and towns.
Typical characteristics:
Lower income levels
Extreme price sensitivity
Large volumes, thin margins
Best suited for:
Mass-market products
Cost-efficient manufacturing
Long-term, volume-driven strategies
Trying to sell an India 1 product at an India 1 price across India 2 and India 3 almost always fails. Not because the product is bad—but because the context is wrong.
Foreign companies often assume that success in one city can be replicated nationally.
In reality:
Pricing that works in metros is unaffordable elsewhere
Marketing messages don’t translate across cultures
Sales cycles vary widely by region
Distribution challenges change from state to state
A centralized strategy creates friction. It slows execution. It increases costs.
Meanwhile, local competitors—who understand these differences intuitively—move faster without needing detailed analysis.
India isn’t just multilingual. It’s multicultural.
Negotiation styles change.
Decision-making speed varies.
Trust is built differently.
Even ideas like “urgency” or “value” mean different things in different regions.
Ignoring this shows up quickly in:
Lower sales effectiveness
Strained partner relationships
Hiring and retention problems
Poor customer experience
Culture and language aren’t background noise in India. They’re business variables.
India’s income distribution is uneven. Dramatically so.
What feels affordable in one region feels premium—or unreachable—in another.
Foreign companies often:
Overestimate average purchasing power
Underestimate how important value-for-money is
Miss strong local alternatives entirely
Products and services need to be designed around regional realities, not national averages.
Companies that do well in India don’t try to “win India” all at once.
They:
Choose specific cities or regions first
Treat each region as a learning market
Customize pricing, products, and messaging
Build regional teams with real authority
Scale only after confidence is earned
They manage India like a portfolio of markets—not a single bet.
If you’re entering India:
Choose cities first, not the country
Pilot region by region
Accept that the national scale comes later
Design flexibility into your strategy from day one
India rewards patience. Learning. Adaptation.
India is politically one country.
For business, it behaves like many.
Companies that accept this move faster, waste less capital, and build stronger foundations. Those that insist on a single India strategy often struggle—not because India is difficult, but because their mental model is wrong.
In India, success doesn’t come from entering the country.
It comes from choosing the right markets within it.